* Disclaimer:The following case summaries should not be relied upon as or for legal advice. Click here for more details.

In re: Cray Inc.
(Docket# 2017-129)(Fed. Cir. 2017)(PDF, 20 pages)
The "regular and established place of business" prong of the patent venue statute (28 U.S.C. 1400(b)) is not triggered by a sales executive who works from his home that happens to be in the district.
TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC
(U.S. 16-341)(S. Ct. 2017)(PDF, 13 pages)
As applied to domestic corporations, the "residence" prong in the patent venue statute (28 U.S.C. 1400(b)) refers only to the State of incorporation.
McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc., et al.
(Docket# 2015-1080)(Fed. Cir. 2016)(PDF, 27 pages)
A claimed process that uses a combined order of specific rules that renders information into a specific format that is then used and applied to create desired results is patent eligible, whether or not the result is tangible.
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al.
(Docket# 2015-1244)(Fed. Cir. 2016)(PDF, 30 pages)
Claims directed to software are not inherently abstract and therefore can be properly analyzed at the first step of the Alice Corp. analysis.
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. et al.
(U.S. 12-786)(S. Ct. 2014)(PDF, 13 pages)

(Docket# 2009-1372)(Fed. Cir. 2015)(PDF, 9 pages)
On remand, an en banc CAFC reversed the District Court and held that Limelight directly infringed the patent at issue.  As part of its decision, the CAFC held that liability under §271(a) can also be found when an alleged infringer conditions participation in an activity or receipt of a benefit upon performance of a step or steps of a patented method and establishes the manner or timing of that performance.
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International et al.
(U.S. 13-298)(S. Ct. 2014)(PDF, 21 pages)
Method, computer-readable medium, and corresponding system claims directed to a computerized trading platform for exchanging obligations in which a trusted third party settles obligations between a first and a second party recite patent-ineligible subject matter.